Yesterday’s judgment on climate change “may well have achieved exactly the opposite effect to what was intended”, the UK’s judge at the European Court of Human Rights said in a partly dissenting opinion.
Judge Eicke accused his judicial colleagues of going beyond what was legitimate and permissible for them to do. They had tried to run before they could …
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to A Lawyer Writes to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.