A Lawyer Writes

Share this post

Who’ll be the chief?

rozenberg.substack.com

Who’ll be the chief?

And who decides?

Joshua Rozenberg
May 24, 2023
∙ Paid
14
3
Share

Who will be the next chief justice of England and Wales? Around the inns of court these days, they speak of little else. But anyone who knows isn’t telling. Perhaps the final decision has not yet been taken.

It’s widely believed that only two candidates were interviewed by a selection panel on 21 April. As I suggested nearly four months ago, they were Dame Victoria Sharp and Dame Sue Carr. Sharp is president of the King’s Bench division of the High Court, effectively the chief justice’s deputy on the criminal side. Carr is a lady justice of appeal and former vice-chair of the Judicial Appointments Commission.

L-R: Dame Victoria Sharp, Dame Sue Carr

Ultimately, the decision is one for the justice secretary and lord chancellor, Alex Chalk KC MP, who will be sworn in later today. But the person he advises the King to appoint must first have been selected by the panel.

It comprised:

  • Helen Pitcher OBE, lay chair of the Judicial Appointments Commission

  • Lord Lloyd-Jones, as the most senior justice of the Supreme Court to have served in the judiciary of England and Wales

  • Sue Hoyle OBE, lay member of the Judicial Appointments Commission

  • Sarah Lee, solicitor member of the Judicial Appointments Commission

  • Lord Justice Edis, the senior presiding judge, who was designated as a member of the panel by the lord chief justice

The panel was required to select one candidate and send a report to the lord chancellor.

It would be surprising if Chalk had rejected the panel’s selection and I have no reason to suppose that this has happened. The lord chancellor would want to consider the panel’s report carefully, consult those who know the candidates and perhaps seek further information. An announcement was never expected before June.

But readers may be interested in the lord chancellor’s options. These are set out in complicated regulations which I will do my best to simplify. Their aim is clearly to limit the lord chancellor’s veto powers and promote compromise in the event of a disagreement.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to A Lawyer Writes to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
Previous
Next
© 2023 Joshua Rozenberg
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing